The Costs of Unemployment in Australia
- 1 December 2000
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Economic and Labour Relations Review
- Vol. 11 (2) , 180-197
- https://doi.org/10.1177/103530460001100203
Abstract
In this paper it is demonstrated that the measurable costs of the sustained high rate of unemployment in Australia are substantially higher than the alleged gains from neo-liberal (microeconomic) reforms. In addition, significant individual and social costs can be identified. Consequently macroeconomic intervention to reduce unemployment should be viewed as a priority, rather than the imposition of market reform with its uncertain impact. The paper concludes with a brief outline of a Job Guarantee Program, advocated by Mitchell (1998) that utilises the principles of the buffer stock mechanism to reduce unemployment. It is argued that the net increase in government outlays is modest and could be offset by a reduction in the level of annual corporate welfare.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Who Loses from UnemploymentJournal of Economic Issues, 1999
- The Buffer Stock Employment Model and the NAIRU: The Path to Full EmploymentJournal of Economic Issues, 1998
- Unemployment, Human Rights and a Full Employment Policy in AustraliaAustralian Journal of Human Rights, 1998
- The Path to full EmploymentAustralian Economic Review, 1997
- From Income Inequality to Economic InequalitySouthern Economic Journal, 1997
- From Income Inequality to Economic InequalitySouthern Economic Journal, 1997
- Estimating the Benefits of Hilmer and Related ReformsAustralian Economic Review, 1997
- The Distribution of Work in Australia*Economic Record, 1996
- Unemployment, Social Psychology, and Unemployment HysteresisJournal of Post Keynesian Economics, 1993