Bias in correlations from selected samples of relatives: The effects of soft selection
- 1 March 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Behavior Genetics
- Vol. 19 (2) , 163-169
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01065901
Abstract
Martin and Wilson (1982) describe two forms of sampling bias in twin studies. One is “hard selection,” where individuals above a threshold participate, and those below do not. The second is “soft selection,” where the probability of including a pair of relatives varies over the range of the character. We present an alternative model of soft selection which has strikingly different consequences for the resemblance between relatives. In general, the softer the threshold, the more the correlation resembles that in the underlying population. Results are presented where the probability of selection equals the cumulative distribution function of a normal distribution with 10% of the variance of the selected variable. In these circumstances, soft selection usually leads to less severely attenuated correlations than truncate selection.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recruitment bias in twin research: The rule of two-thirds reconsideredBehavior Genetics, 1987
- Altruism and GeneticsActa geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research, 1984
- Bias in the estimation of heritability from truncated samples of twinsBehavior Genetics, 1982
- Volunteer bias in twin research: The rule of two‐thirdsSocial Biology, 1978
- The Numerical Evaluation of Certain Multivariate Normal IntegralsThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1962