Reflex chronotropic and inotropic effects of calcium channel-blocking agents in conscious dogs. Diltiazem, verapamil, and nifedipine compared.
- 1 March 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation Research
- Vol. 52 (3) , 302-311
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.52.3.302
Abstract
In chronically instrumented, conscious dogs, rapid injection of equihypotensive doses of three calcium channel-blocking agents, verapamil (250 micrograms/kg), diltiazem (200 micrograms/kg) and nifedipine (50 micrograms/kg), produced disparate chronotropic and inotropic responses. Although they all decreased mean arterial pressure by about 10%, heart rate (93 +/- 4 beats/min) was markedly increased to 175 +/- 12 with nifedipine, to 163 +/- 15 with verapamil, and only slightly increased to 118 +/- 7 with diltiazem. Contractile responses measured before (left ventricular dP/dtmax, 2749 +/- 131 mm Hg/sec) and during left ventricular ejection (endocardial dimension dD/dtmax, 57 +/- 4 mm/sec) were increased by 24% and 14% with nifedipine, decreased by 26% and 22% with verapamil, and were unchanged with diltiazem. These chronotropic and inotropic responses to rapid intravenous administration of the three drugs were increased in a dose-dependent manner. Similar results also were observed after slow infusion of these drugs. To determine the extent to which autonomic reflexes participated in these cardiac responses, propranolol (0.5 mg/kg) or propranolol plus atropine (0.1-0.2 mg/kg) was administered prior to injection of each calcium channel-blocking agent. Propranolol abolished the positive inotropic response to nifedipine and potentiated the negative inotropic response to verapamil. Positive chronotropic responses to verapamil, nifedipine, and diltiazem were attenuated by propranolol plus atropine. These results suggest that equihypotensive doses of the three prominent calcium channel-blocking agents exert different degrees of autonomic reflex activation in awake, unsedated dogs. These reflexes, which modulate the direct effects of calcium channel-blocking agents on chronotropic and inotropic variables of the heart, may have important clinical implications.This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative electrophysiologic and coronary hemodynamic effects of diltiazem, nisoldipine and verapamil on myocardial tissueThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1982
- Differential cardiovascular effects of calcium channel blocking agents: Potential mechanismsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1982
- IntroductionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1982
- Verapamil Competitively Inhibits α1-Adrenergic and Muscarinic but Not β-Adrenergic Receptors in Rat MyocardiumJournal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 1982
- Intracardiac electrophysiologic study of intravenous diltiazem and combined diltiazem-digoxin in patientsAmerican Heart Journal, 1982
- Differential effects of systemic and intracoronary calcium channel blocking agents on global and regional left ventricular function in conscious dogsAmerican Heart Journal, 1981
- Comparative pharmacology of calcium antagonists: Nifedipine, verapamil and diltiazemThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1980
- Effect of nifedipine on atrioventricular conduction as compared with verapamil. Intracardiac electrophysiological study.Heart, 1979
- Differential Effects of D 600 on Release of Catecholamines by Acetylcholine, Histamine, Tyramine and by Cyclic AMP from Canine Adrenal Medulla.The Japanese Journal of Pharmacology, 1978
- Specific Pharmacology of Calcium in Myocardium, Cardiac Pacemakers, and Vascular Smooth MuscleAnnual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 1977