Post‐synaptic activity evoked in the nucleus tractus solitarius by carotid sinus and aortic nerve afferents in the cat.

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Post‐synaptic responses evoked in neurones of the nucleus tractus solitarius by electrical stimulation of the carotid sinus, aortic and vagal nerves, alone or in combination, have been studied in anaesthetized cats using both extracellular and intracellular recording techniques. A total of 292 neurones received an input from at least one of the three nerves tested. The activity of the large majority of these cells (249) could only be shown to be altered by stimulation of one of these nerves and in 222 of these cases this was an excitatory response. These responses showed the expected post‐synaptic characteristics including temporal summation and, in intracellular records, a summation of evoked excitatory post‐synaptic potentials (e.p.s.p.s). The minimum latency to onset of these responses was variable, both for individual cells and for the population as a whole and varied within the range 2‐124 ms. In a small number of cells (twenty‐seven), the input was purely inhibitory in nature. In neurones showing a tonic discharge this produced a decrease in the rate of firing. This influence was most marked in intracellular records where membrane hyperpolarizations were noted. Again, the latency to onset was variable, in the range 4‐27 ms. Convergent inputs from two or more of the nerves were identified in forty‐three neurones. The effects of these were always excitatory. They could be observed both as a facilitation of spike activity recorded extracellularly and as summation of subliminally evoked e.p.s.p.s recorded intracellularly. On the basis of threshold voltages and latency to onset, the afferents to these neurones are indistinguishable from those providing an exclusive input. It can be concluded that at least some of the neurones in the nucleus tractus solitarius and its vicinity receive inputs from more than one source. The implications of these observations on the role of this brain‐stem area in cardiorespiratory reflexes is discussed.