Impact on survival of intensive follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
Top Cited Papers
- 6 April 2002
- Vol. 324 (7341) , 813
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7341.813
Abstract
Objective: To review the evidence from clinical trials of follow up of patients after curative resection for colorectal cancer. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of intensive compared with control follow up. Main outcome measures: All cause mortality at five years (primary outcome). Rates of recurrence of intraluminal, local, and metastatic disease and metachronous (second colorectal primary) cancers (secondary outcomes). Results: Five trials, which included 1342 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Intensive follow up was associated with a reduction in all cause mortality (combined risk ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.70 to 0.94, P=0.007). The effect was most pronounced in the four extramural detection trials that used computed tomography and frequent measurements of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (risk ratio 0.73, 0.60 to 0.89, P=0.002). Intensive follow up was associated with significantly earlier detection of all recurrences (difference in means 8.5 months, 7.6 to 9.4 months, PConclusions: Intensive follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer improves survival. Large trials are required to identify which components of intensive follow up are most beneficial. What is already known on this topic There is a lack of direct evidence that intensive follow up after initial curative treatment for colorectal cancer leads to increased survival Guidelines are inconclusive and clinical practice varies widely What this study adds The cumulative analysis of available data supports the view that intensive follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer improves survival If computed tomography and frequent measurements of serum carcinoembryonic antigen are used during follow up mortality related to cancer is reduced by 9-13% This survival benefit is partly attributable to the earlier detection of all recurrences, particularly the increased detection of isolated recurrent diseaseKeywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influence of Follow-up on Health-Related Quality of Life after Radical Surgery for Colorectal CancerScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1999
- Role of follow-up in management of local recurrences of colorectal cancerDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1998
- Surveillance of colorectal cancerDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1996
- The value of serum carcinoembryonic antigen in predicting recurrent disease following curative resection of colorectal cancerDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1994
- Early results of follow-up after radical resection for colorectal cancer. Preliminary results of a prospective randomized trialSurgical Oncology, 1992
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- Failure Patterns Following Curative Resection of Colonic CarcinomaAnnals of Surgery, 1984
- Incidence of synchronous and metachronous colorectal carcinomaBritish Journal of Surgery, 1984
- Large bowel cancer: Surgical pathology and its relationship to survivalBritish Journal of Surgery, 1984
- Metachronous cancer of the large intestineDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1972