Benchmarking and Analysis of Protein Docking Performance in Rosetta v3.2
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 2 August 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 6 (8) , e22477
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022477
Abstract
RosettaDock has been increasingly used in protein docking and design strategies in order to predict the structure of protein-protein interfaces. Here we test capabilities of RosettaDock 3.2, part of the newly developed Rosetta v3.2 modeling suite, against Docking Benchmark 3.0, and compare it with RosettaDock v2.3, the latest version of the previous Rosetta software package. The benchmark contains a diverse set of 116 docking targets including 22 antibody-antigen complexes, 33 enzyme-inhibitor complexes, and 60 ‘other’ complexes. These targets were further classified by expected docking difficulty into 84 rigid-body targets, 17 medium targets, and 14 difficult targets. We carried out local docking perturbations for each target, using the unbound structures when available, in both RosettaDock v2.3 and v3.2. Overall the performances of RosettaDock v2.3 and v3.2 were similar. RosettaDock v3.2 achieved 56 docking funnels, compared to 49 in v2.3. A breakdown of docking performance by protein complex type shows that RosettaDock v3.2 achieved docking funnels for 63% of antibody-antigen targets, 62% of enzyme-inhibitor targets, and 35% of ‘other’ targets. In terms of docking difficulty, RosettaDock v3.2 achieved funnels for 58% of rigid-body targets, 30% of medium targets, and 14% of difficult targets. For targets that failed, we carry out additional analyses to identify the cause of failure, which showed that binding-induced backbone conformation changes account for a majority of failures. We also present a bootstrap statistical analysis that quantifies the reliability of the stochastic docking results. Finally, we demonstrate the additional functionality available in RosettaDock v3.2 by incorporating small-molecules and non-protein co-factors in docking of a smaller target set. This study marks the most extensive benchmarking of the RosettaDock module to date and establishes a baseline for future research in protein interface modeling and structure prediction.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- SnugDock: Paratope Structural Optimization during Antibody-Antigen Docking Compensates for Errors in Antibody Homology ModelsPLoS Computational Biology, 2010
- PyRosetta: a script-based interface for implementing molecular modeling algorithms using RosettaBioinformatics, 2010
- Identification of Structural Mechanisms of HIV-1 Protease Specificity Using Computational Peptide Docking: Implications for Drug ResistanceStructure, 2009
- RosettaLigand Docking with Full Ligand and Receptor FlexibilityJournal of Molecular Biology, 2008
- Emergence of symmetry in homooligomeric biological assembliesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- Conformer Selection and Induced Fit in Flexible Backbone Protein–Protein Docking Using Computational and NMR EnsemblesJournal of Molecular Biology, 2008
- Protein–protein docking benchmark version 3.0Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics, 2008
- A combination of rescoring and refinement significantly improves protein docking performanceProteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics, 2008
- The performance of ZDOCK and ZRANK in rounds 6–11 of CAPRIProteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics, 2007
- Incorporating biochemical information and backbone flexibility in RosettaDock for CAPRI rounds 6–12Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics, 2007