MASCIS Evaluation of Open Field Locomotor Scores: Effects of Experience and Teamwork on Reliability
- 1 July 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Journal of Neurotrauma
- Vol. 13 (7) , 343-359
- https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.1996.13.343
Abstract
The Multicenter Animal Spinal Cord Injury Study (MASCIS) adopted a modified 21-point open field locomotor scale developed by Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB) at Ohio State University (OSU) to measure motor recovery in spinal-injured rats. BBB scores categorize combinations of rat hindlimb movements, trunk position and stability, stepping, coordination, paw placement, toe clearance, and tail position, representing sequential recovery stages that rats attain after spinal cord injury. A total of 22 observers from 8 participating centers assessed 18 hindlimbs of 9 rats at 2–6 weeks after graded spinal cord injury. The observers were segregated into 10 teams. The teams were grouped into 3 cohorts (A, B, and C), consisting of one experienced team from OSU and two non-OSU teams. The cohorts evaluated the rats in three concurrent and sequential sessions. After viewing a rat for 4 min, individual observers first assigned scores without discussion. Members of each team then discussed and assigned a team score. Experience (OSU vs. non-OSU) and teamwork (individual vs. team) had no significant effect on mean scores although the mean scores of one cohort differed significantly from the others (p = 0.0002, ANOVA). However, experience and teamwork significantly influenced reliability of scoring. OSU team scores had a mean standard deviation or discordance of 0.59 points, significantly less than 1.31 points for non-OSU team scores (p = 0.003, ANOVA) and 1.30 points for non-OSU individual scores (p = 0.001, ANOVA). Discordances were greater at the upper and lower ends of the scale, exceeding 2.0 in the lower (15) ends of the scale but were r2) of 0.894. These results indicate that inexperienced observers can learn quickly to assign consistent BBB scores that approach those given by experienced teams, that the scores are most consistent between 4 and 16, and that experience improves consistency of team scores.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Sensitive and Reliable Locomotor Rating Scale for Open Field Testing in RatsJournal of Neurotrauma, 1995
- Modeling of Acute Spinal Cord Injury in the Rat: Neuroprotection and Enhanced Recovery with Methylprednisolone, U-74006F and YM-14673Experimental Neurology, 1994
- The effects of methylprednisolone and the ganglioside GM1 on acute spinal cord injury in ratsJournal of Neurosurgery, 1994
- A Comparison of YM-14673, U-50488H, and Nalmefene after Spinal Cord Injury in the RatExperimental Neurology, 1993
- Anatomic and Behavioral Outcome After Spinal Cord Injury Produced by a Displacement Controlled Impact DeviceJournal of Neurotrauma, 1992
- Spinal Cord Injury Produced by Consistent Mechanical Displacement of the Cord in Rats: Behavioral and Histologic AnalysisJournal of Neurotrauma, 1992
- Criteria for Assessing Recovery of Function After Spinal Cord Injury: Behavioral Methods*,†Journal of Neurotrauma, 1991
- Behavioral assessment of functional deficit in rats with contusive spinal cord injuryJournal of Neuroscience Methods, 1987
- A behavioral and anatomical analysis of spinal cord injury produced by a feedback-controlled impaction deviceExperimental Neurology, 1987
- Spinal cord contusion in the rat: Behavioral analysis of functional neurologic impairment☆Experimental Neurology, 1985