A classification of pregnancy losses after invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures: an approach to allow comparison of units with a different case mix
- 28 April 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Prenatal Diagnosis
- Vol. 23 (6) , 488-492
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.623
Abstract
Objective Pregnancy loss rates after prenatal invasive procedures such as amniocentesis (Amnio), chorionic villous sampling (CVS) and fetal blood sampling (FBS) vary with an underlying indication for the procedure and due to different background risk of miscarriage. Loss rates need to be quantified and available for counselling. We developed a classification of pregnancy losses that will help in calculating procedure-related pregnancy loss rates and allow comparison between units with a different case mix. Methods The procedure-related pregnancy loss rate was obtained by subtracting the losses in pregnancies with known lethal conditions and those occurring more than two weeks after the procedure from total pregnancy losses. Results Out of 436 CVSs, there were 18 losses. Of these, 14 had a known lethal condition and 3 occurred after 2 weeks of CVS. In only one case, there was no known lethal abnormality and the loss occurred within 2 weeks. Thus, the total pregnancy loss rate was 4.1% and the procedure-related loss rate was 0.23% (95% CI; 0.0061–1.28). The procedure-related loss rates for Amnio 0.7% (95% CI; 0.2–1.8) and FBS 1.19 (95% CI; 0.14–4.23) were calculated in a similar way. Conclusions We present a method of recording pregnancy loss after prenatal invasive procedures, which would be useful for benchmarking comparison between units and pre-procedural counselling. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Management of Anti-Rhesus-D Antibodies in Pregnancy: A Review from 1994 to 1998Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 2001
- Randomised study of risk of fetal loss related to early amniocentesis versus chorionic villus samplingThe Lancet, 1997
- Percutaneous Umbilical Blood Sampling: Indication Changes and Procedure Loss Rate in a Nine Years’ ExperienceFetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 1996
- Cordocentesis: Overall Pregnancy Loss Rate as Important as Procedure Loss RateFetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 1994
- Fetal blood sampling and pregnancy loss in relation to indicationBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1991
- Audit of amniocentesis from a district general hospital: is it worth it?BMJ, 1990
- The Safety and Efficacy of Chorionic Villus Sampling for Early Prenatal Diagnosis of Cytogenetic AbnormalitiesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF GENETIC AMNIOCENTESIS IN 4606 LOW-RISK WOMENPublished by Elsevier ,1986
- FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH LOW BIRTH WEIGHT OF INFANTS DELIVERED AT TERMBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1978