The Impact of Trades on Daily Volatility
- 21 February 2006
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 19 (4) , 1241-1277
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhj027
Abstract
This article proposes a trading-based explanation for the asymmetric effect in daily volatility of individual stock returns. Previous studies propose two major hypotheses for this phenomenon: leverage effect and time-varying expected returns. However, leverage has no impact on asymmetric volatility at the daily frequency and, moreover, we observe asymmetric volatility for stocks with no leverage. Also, expected returns may vary with the business cycle, that is, at a lower than daily frequency. Trading activity of contrarian and herding investors has a robust effect on the relationship between daily volatility and lagged return. Consistent with the predictions of the rational expectation models, the non-informational liquidity-driven (herding) trades increase volatility following stock price declines, and the informed (contrarian) trades reduce volatility following stock price increases. The results are robust to different measures of volatility and trading activity. (JEL C30, G11, G12)Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Liquidity and Autocorrelations in Individual Stock ReturnsSSRN Electronic Journal, 2005
- The Skewness Premium and the Asymmetric Volatility PuzzleSSRN Electronic Journal, 2004
- On estimating the expected return on the market: An exploratory investigationPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Price, trade size, and information in securities marketsPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- The distribution of realized stock return volatilityPublished by Elsevier ,2001
- Asymmetric Volatility and Risk in Equity MarketsThe Review of Financial Studies, 2000
- Comments from the EditorJournal of Management, 1989
- Expected stock returns and volatilityJournal of Financial Economics, 1987
- Stock return variancesJournal of Financial Economics, 1986
- Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticityJournal of Econometrics, 1986