Accuracy of Corrections for Restriction in Range Due to Explicit Selection in Heteroscedastic and Nonlinear Distributions
- 2 July 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 40 (2) , 337-346
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000208
Abstract
Corrections for restriction in range due to explicit selection assume linearity of regression and homoscedastic array variances. Violation of one or both of these assumptions can lead to serious errors in estimating the unrestricted population correlation. A Monte Carlo study was conducted to examine the effects of some common forms of violation of these assumptions. The results suggested that the corrected correlation provides a fairly good estimate of the population correlation for moderately restricted samples but becomes progressively less accurate with increasing degrees of restriction. In addition, corrected estimates were generally more accurate than corresponding uncorrected estimates of the population correlation.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of curtailment on an admissions model for a graduate management program.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973
- An Empirical Note on Correlation Coefficients Corrected for Restriction in RangeEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1971
- AN INVESTIGATION OF THE ACCURACY OF THE PEARSON SELECTION FORMULASPublished by Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) ,1969
- Range restriction problems in the use of self-selected groups for test validation.Psychological Bulletin, 1968
- Theory of mental tests.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1950
- I. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. —XI. On the influence of natural selection on the variability and correlation of organsPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 1903