Prediction of potentially insignificant prostate cancer in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically organ‐confined disease
Open Access
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Urology
- Vol. 12 (3) , 270-274
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01041.x
Abstract
Background: The objectives of the present study were to characterize, according to tumor significance, the clinicopathological features of patients with prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy, and to determine useful parameters for predicting insignificant disease before surgery. Methods: In this series, we included 195 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for clinically organ‐confined prostate cancer at our institution between January 1999 and November 2003. Several clinicopathological factors were analyzed, focusing on whether the largest tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens was ≥0.5 cm3 or 3, which is the criterion defined to distinguish insignificant cancer from significant cancer. Results: Potentially insignificant cancer was detected in 28 of 195 patients (14.4%). There were significant differences between patients with insignificant disease and those with significant disease in serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) as well as all biopsy parameters, with the exception of biopsy Gleason score. Furthermore, final pathological examination demonstrated that these two patient groups showed significant differences in Gleason score and the incidence of extraprostatic disease extension. Pearson's correlation analysis showed that tumor volume in the prostatectomy specimens was significantly associated with serum PSA and all biopsy parameters; however, each of the correlations was comparatively weak. There was no single parameter that could viewed as a useful predictor of tumor significance. The best model for predicting insignificant tumor was the combined use of biopsy Gleason score . Conclusions: These findings indicate that clinicopathological findings suggesting favorable features are well observed in patients with potentially insignificant prostate cancer compared to those with significant prostate cancer, and the combination of a biopsy Gleason score <7 and PPBC <15% might be useful as a predictor of insignificant disease.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- REPLY BY AUTHORSJournal of Urology, 2002
- DOES INCREASED NEEDLE BIOPSY SAMPLING OF THE PROSTATE DETECT A HIGHER NUMBER OF POTENTIALLY INSIGNIFICANT TUMORS?Journal of Urology, 2001
- RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SYSTEMATIC BIOPSIES AND HISTOLOGICAL FEATURES OF 222 RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS: LACK OF PREDICTION OF TUMOR SIGNIFICANCE FOR MEN WITH NONPALPABLE PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, 2001
- A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING 6 VERSUS 12 PROSTATE BIOPSY CORES: IMPACT ON CANCER DETECTIONJournal of Urology, 2000
- DETECTION RATE OF HISTOLOGICALLY INSIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER WITH SYSTEMATIC SEXTANT BIOPSIES AND FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION CYTOLOGYJournal of Urology, 2000
- DETECTION RATE OF HISTOLOGICALLY INSIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER WITH SYSTEMATIC SEXTANT BIOPSIES AND FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION CYTOLOGYJournal of Urology, 2000
- NONPALPABLE STAGE T1C PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, 1998
- Routine Transition Zone and Seminal Vesicle Biopsies in All Patients Undergoing Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsies are Not IndicatedJournal of Urology, 1997
- Routine Transition Zone and Seminal Vesicle Biopsies in All Patients Undergoing Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsies are Not IndicatedJournal of Urology, 1997
- Distinguishing Clinically Important from Unimportant Prostate Cancers Before TreatmentJournal of Urology, 1996