Focal liver lesions: Comparison of dual‐phase CT and multisequence multiplanar MR imaging including dynamic gadolinium enhancement
Open Access
- 1 March 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Vol. 13 (3) , 397-401
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1057
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare dual‐phase spiral computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using dynamic gadolinium enhancement for liver lesion detection and characterization. Twenty‐two consecutive patients underwent dual‐phase spiral CT and MRI for the evaluation of focal liver disease within a 1‐month period. Spiral CT and MR images were interpreted prospectively, in a blinded fashion by separate, individual, experienced investigators, to determine lesion detection and characterization. Liver lesions were confirmed by surgery and pathology in 6 patients, and by clinical and imaging follow‐up in the other 16 patients. Pathological correlation of a primary extrahepatic malignancy was available in 5 of the 16 patients who had metastatic liver disease. Spiral CT and MRI detected 53 and 63 lesions, and characterized 39 and 62 true positive lesions, respectively. A kappa statistic test was applied to assess agreement between MR and CT results. MR versus CT for lesion detection resulted in a kappa statistic of 0.54 (95% confidence interval), indicating moderate agreement, and 0.32 (95% confidence interval) for lesion characterization, indicating only slight agreement. More lesions were detected on MR images than CT images in 6 (27%) patients, with lesions detected only on MR images in 4 (18%) patients. More lesions were characterized on MR images in 9 (41%) patients. In 9 patients with a discrepancy between MR and CT findings, the MR images added information considered significant to patient management in all 9 cases. MRI was moderately superior to dual‐phase spiral CT for lesion detection, and was markedly superior for lesion characterization, with these differences having clinical significance. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001;13:397–401.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Liver lesion detection, characterization, and effect on patient management: Comparison of single‐phase spiral CT and current MR techniquesJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1997
- Helical biphasic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: technique, indications, interpretation, and pitfalls.Radiology, 1996
- Helical CT of the liver: value of an early hepatic arterial phase.Radiology, 1995
- Hypervascular malignant liver lesions: comparison of various MR imaging pulse sequences and dynamic CT.Radiology, 1994
- Solitary hepatic metastasis: Comparison of dynamic contrast‐enhanced CT and MR imaging with fat‐suppressed T2‐weighted, Breath‐hold T1‐weighted FLASH, and dynamic gadolinium‐enhanced FLASH sequencesJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1994
- Dynamic breath-hold multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging with gadolinium enhancement for differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from malignancies at 1.5 T.Radiology, 1993
- Islet cell tumors: comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MR imaging with dynamic gadolinium enhancement and fat suppression.Radiology, 1993
- Abdominal MR imaging: comparison of T2-weighted fast and conventional spin-echo, and contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging.Radiology, 1993
- Hypervascular liver lesions: differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from malignant tumors with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging.Radiology, 1993
- Focal liver disease: comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and T2-weighted fat-suppressed, FLASH, and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T.Radiology, 1992