Clinical and Ultrasound Parameters to Predict the Risk of Cesarean Delivery After Induction of Labor
- 1 February 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 107 (2, Part 1) , 227-233
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000196508.11431.c0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether factors in the maternal history and/or ultrasound parameters are useful in predicting the risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor. METHODS: Maternal age, height, body mass index, parity, gestational age, Bishop score, ultrasonic amniotic fluid volume, fetal head position, estimated fetal weight, and transvaginal cervical length were studied prospectively in 267 women at 36 or more weeks of gestation immediately before induction of labor. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine which factors best predicted the risk of cesarean delivery. Receiver operating characteristic curves and a resampling technique were used to evaluate the model’s performance. RESULTS: Eighty (30%) of these 267 women had cesarean delivery. Logistic regression was performed and a final model chosen, which included parity (odds ratio [OR] 20.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.97–53.05, P < .001), body mass index (OR 6.17, 95% CI 2.10–18.13, P < .001), height (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89–0.98, P = .005), and ultrasonic transvaginal cervical length (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.04–1.11, P < .001) as the best predictors of cesarean delivery. A risk score was calculated containing these 4 parameters, which predicted reasonably accurately the risk of cesarean delivery. CONCLUSION: Parity, body mass index, height, and ultrasonic transvaginal cervical length are the most accurate parameters in predicting the risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor. A predictive model using these would allow more accurate counseling and better informed consent in the decision-making process regarding induction of labor LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bishop Score and Risk of Cesarean Delivery After Induction of Labor in Nulliparous WomenObstetrics & Gynecology, 2005
- Labor Induction Rate Variation in Upstate New York: What Is the Difference?Birth, 2003
- Pre‐induction sonographic measurement of cervical length in prolonged pregnancy: the effect of parity in the prediction of the need for Cesarean sectionUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2003
- Assessment of the cervix in the third trimester of pregnancy using transvaginal ultrasound scanningEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2002
- Rising rates of labor induction: present concerns and future strategiesObstetrics & Gynecology, 2002
- Effect of Mode of Delivery in Nulliparous Women on Neonatal Intracranial InjuryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Bishop Score: A Poor Diagnostic Test To Predict Failed Induction Versus Vaginal DeliverySouthern Medical Journal, 1998
- The value of the cervical score in predicting successful outcome of labor inductionObstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
- Induction of Labor as Compared with Serial Antenatal Monitoring in Post-Term PregnancyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- The relative risks of caesarean section (intrapartum and elective) and vaginal delivery: a detailed analysis to exclude the effects of medical disorders and other acute pre‐existing physiological disturbancesBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1990