Perinatal mortality and morbidity among babies delivered in water: surveillance study and postal survey
- 21 August 1999
- Vol. 319 (7208) , 483-487
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7208.483
Abstract
Aim: To compare perinatal morbidity and mortality for babies delivered in water with rates for babies delivered conventionally (not in water). Design: Surveillance study (of all consultant paediatricians) and postal survey (of all NHS maternity units). Setting: British Isles (surveillance study); England and Wales (postal survey). Subjects: Babies born in the British Isles between April 1994 and March 1996 who died perinatally or were admitted for special care within 48 hours of birth after delivery in water or after labour in water followed by conventional delivery (surveillance study); babies delivered in water in England and Wales in the same period (postal survey). Main outcome measures: Number of deliveries in water in the British Isles that resulted in perinatal death or in admission to special care within 48 hours of birth; and proportions (of such deliveries) of all water births in England and Wales. Results: 4032 deliveries (0.6% of all deliveries) in England and Wales occurred in water. Perinatal mortality was 1.2/1000 (95% confidence interval 0.4 to 2.9) live births; 8.4/1000 (5.8 to 11.8) live births were admitted for special care. No deaths were directly attributable to delivery in water, but 2 admissions were for water aspiration. UK reports of mortality and special care admission rates for babies of women considered to be at low risk of complications during delivery who delivered conventionally ranged from 0.8/1000 (0.2 to 4.2) to 4.6/1000 (0.1 to 25) live births and from 9.2 (1.1 to 33) to 64/1000 (58 to 70) live births respectively. Compared with regional data for low risk, spontaneous, normal vaginal deliveries at term, the relative risk for perinatal mortality associated with delivery in water was 0.9 (99% confidence interval 0.2 to 3.6). Conclusions: Perinatal mortality is not substantially higher among babies delivered in water than among those born to low risk women who delivered conventionally. The data are compatible with a small increase or decrease in perinatal mortality for babies delivered in water. Data on adverse effects of delivery in water have been limited Perinatal mortality and risk of admission for special care is similar for babies delivered in water and for low risk deliveries that do not take place in water The risk of perinatal mortality for babies delivered in water is similar to the risk for babies born by normal vaginal delivery to women at low risk of adverse outcome Delivery in water may have caused water aspiration in two babies and contributed to snapped umbilical cord in fiveKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- The British Paediatric Surveillance Unit — a pioneering method for investigating the less common disorders of childhood. Report of a seminar held in June 1995Child: Care, Health and Development, 1998
- The Effects of Whirlpool Baths in Labor: A Randomized, Controlled TrialBirth, 1996
- Outcome in low risk pregnancies.Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal & Neonatal, 1996
- The standard primipara as a basis for inter‐unit comparisons of maternity careBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1996
- Birth under water–to breathe or not to breatheBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1996
- Labour and delivery of ‘normal’ primiparous women: analysis of routinely collected dataBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1995
- ‘To bathe or not to bathe’ during the first stage of laborActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1994
- Water immersion and the effect on laborJournal of Nurse-Midwifery, 1993
- Birthing pools and the fetusThe Lancet, 1993
- Outcome of planned home births in an inner city practice.BMJ, 1991