The functionalist theory of stratification: Two decades of controversy
- 1 January 1966
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Inquiry
- Vol. 9 (1-4) , 215-240
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00201746608601459
Abstract
The author examines the 1945 and 1948 versions of the Davis‐Moore functionalist theory of stratification. The analysis explores the basic postulates, assumptions, and logical articulation of the theory and isolates its distinctively functionalist components. This is followed by a historical account of the major criticisms leveled at the theory. The critics have succeeded in showing the fallacious and tautologous character of the functionalist components, thus, in effect, destroying the theory as a theory. Despite this destruction, various portions of the Davis‐Moore theory are shown to be usable, to contain valuable insights, and to be capable of further development.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Sociology of Mexico: Stalking The Path Not TakenAnnual Review of Sociology, 1992
- Some Empirical Consequences of the Davis-Moore Theory of StratificationAmerican Sociological Review, 1963
- A Logical Analysis of the Davis-Moore Theory of StratificationAmerican Sociological Review, 1963
- On Equitable InequalityAmerican Sociological Review, 1963
- The Functional Theory of Stratification: Some Neglected ConsiderationsAmerican Sociological Review, 1959
- The Myth of Functional Analysis as a Special Method in Sociology and AnthropologyAmerican Sociological Review, 1959
- Social Stratification and the Functional Theory of Social DifferentiationAmerican Sociological Review, 1958
- A Modification of the Functional Theory of Social StratificationSocial Forces, 1956
- Functional Alternatives to InequalityAmerican Sociological Review, 1955
- Some Principles of Stratification: A Critical AnalysisAmerican Sociological Review, 1953