Archaeofaunal Relative Abundance, Sample Size, and Statistical Methods
- 28 February 2001
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Archaeological Science
- Vol. 28 (2) , 185-195
- https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.2000.0558
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Large Mammal Relative Abundance in Pithouse and Pueblo Period Archaeofaunas from Southwestern New Mexico: Resource Depression among the Mimbres-Mogollon?Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 2000
- Changing Diet Breadth in the Early Upper Palaeolithic of Southwestern FranceJournal of Archaeological Science, 1998
- Stone Tool Assemblage Richness during the Middle and Early Upper Palaeolithic in FranceJournal of Archaeological Science, 1998
- Fremont Hunting and Resource Intensification in the Eastern Great BasinJournal of Archaeological Science, 1997
- Widening diet breadth, declining foraging efficiency, and prehistoric harvest pressure: ichthyofaunal evidence from the Emeryville Shellmound, CaliforniaPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1997
- The Sample Size-Richness Relation: A Comment on Plog and HegmonAmerican Antiquity, 1997
- Declines in Mammalian Foraging Efficiency during the Late Holocene, San Francisco Bay, CaliforniaJournal of Anthropological Archaeology, 1994
- Late Holocene Resource Intensification in the Sacramento Valley, California: The Vertebrate EvidenceJournal of Archaeological Science, 1994
- Alpine faunas from the White Mountains, California: Adaptive change in the late prehistoric great basin?Journal of Archaeological Science, 1991
- Measuring Archaeological Diversity by Comparison with Simulated AssemblagesAmerican Antiquity, 1984