System response time and method of pay: Stress effects in computer‐based tasks
- 1 January 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction
- Vol. 1 (1) , 23-39
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318909525955
Abstract
The effects of computer system response time (slowvs. rapid) and method of pay (incentive vs. nonincentive) on mood disturbances and somatic discomfort were evaluated in a computer‐based data entry task among 45 professional typists. Self‐ratings of mood disturbances and somatic discomfort were taken at regular intervals over four consecutive workdays. Regardless of method of pay, slow response time generated higher ratings of frustration and impatience than did rapid response time. In addition, ratings of rush and tension were higher with incentive pay than without incentive pay, regardless of system response time. Mood disturbances and somatic discomfort increased linearly with the amount of time spent performing the data entry task over the course of the workday. This effect was independent of system response time or method of pay. However, scheduled rest and lunch breaks moderated these cumulative increases in mood disturbances and somatic discomfort. The results indicate that computer systems which incorporate features such as rapid response times reduce work stress, while the motivational advantages of computer‐based incentive pay programs must be balanced against the stress effects of this method of pay.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Experimental investigation of psychophysiological stress-reactions induced by different system response times in human-computer interaction∗Ergonomics, 1987
- The clinical impact of job designBritish Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1985
- Software ergonomics: effects of computer application design parameters on operator task performance and healthErgonomics, 1984
- System response time operator productivity, and job satisfactionCommunications of the ACM, 1983
- Job and health implications of VDT useCommunications of the ACM, 1983
- Visual, Musculoskeletal, and Performance Differences between Good and Poor VDT WorkstationsProceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, 1982
- Relationship of daily hassles, uplifts, and major life events to health status.Health Psychology, 1982
- Job decision latitude, job demands, and cardiovascular disease: a prospective study of Swedish men.American Journal of Public Health, 1981
- Comparison of two modes of stress measurement: Daily hassles and uplifts versus major life eventsJournal of Behavioral Medicine, 1981
- 6 CONDITIONS OF WORK AND SYMPATHOADRENO‐MEDULLARY ACTIVITY: EXPERIMENTAL MANIPULATIONS IN A REAL LIFE SETTINGActa Medica Scandinavica, 1972