Quantitative comparison of motor unit potential parameters between monopolar and concentric needles
- 13 October 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Muscle & Nerve
- Vol. 14 (10) , 1028-1032
- https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880141015
Abstract
This study quantitatively compared the simultaneous recording of the “same” motor unit potentials recorded by closely positioned concentric and monopolar needles. The motor unit potentials from the anterior tibialis of 12 young subjects were analyzed independently by both needles being connected to 2 sets of EMG‐computer combinations. Recordings of the same motor unit potentials were confirmed by triggering and averaging of the 2 sets of motor unit potentials with identical firing patterns on both EMG screens. Automatic analysis disclosed the monopolar recordings had a significantly higher mean amplitude (2.05 times), larger surface area (2.64 times), and longer duration (1.86 times) than the concentric recordings, while the mean number of phases (1.58 times) and turns (1.35 times) revealed no statistical differences. Both active recording and reference electrodes contributed to these differences.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intramuscular Recording in Neurodiagnostic StudiesAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 1989
- Properties of motor unit action potentials recorded with concentric and monopolar needle electrodes: ADEMG analysisMuscle & Nerve, 1988
- Motor Unit AnalysisAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 1988
- ELECTROMYOGRAPHY—NORMALPublished by Elsevier ,1984
- Macro EMG, a new recording technique.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1980
- Electrophysiological cross section of the motor unit.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1980
- Action Potential Parameters in Normal Human Muscle and their Dependence on Physical Variables.Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 1954
- Muscle Action Potentials in PolymyositisNeurology, 1953