Thatcher and the Cheshire Cat: Context and the Processing of Facial Features
- 1 December 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perception
- Vol. 14 (6) , 747-754
- https://doi.org/10.1068/p140747
Abstract
As has been noted before, a face made gruesome by the inversion of its mouth will not be so perceived when the entire construction is inverted. Results are presented which suggest that this is because (a) the mouth and eye features are evaluated individually (although each feature may influence the evaluation of the other) and (b) the mouth, whether normal or inverted, tends to have its uppermost part assigned as ‘top’, providing for either a pleasant smiling-mouth expression or a gruesome ‘biting-intention’ expression. However, the gruesomeness of an inverted mouth is attenuated when eyes are shown below it (producing an inverted smiling face) which suggests that the location of other facial features can also influence the assignments of ‘top’.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Human Aging and Spatial VisionScience, 1980
- Margaret Thatcher: A New IllusionPerception, 1980
- Perceptual Determinants of Gaze Aversion By the Lesser Mouse Lemur (Microcebus Murinus), the Role of Two Facing EyesBehaviour, 1978
- Imitation of Facial and Manual Gestures by Human NeonatesScience, 1977
- Measuring facial movementJournal of Nonverbal Behavior, 1976
- Face recognition by brain-injured patients: A dissociable ability?Neuropsychologia, 1970
- Human Facial ExpressionMan, 1969
- Looking at upside-down faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969
- The RÔle of the Upper and the Lower Parts of the Face as a Basis for Judging Facial Expressions: II. In Posed Expressions and “Candid-Camera” PicturesThe Journal of General Psychology, 1944
- The judgment of facial expression.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1930