Comorbidity Measures for Use with Administrative Data
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medical Care
- Vol. 36 (1) , 8-27
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199801000-00004
Abstract
This study attempts to develop a comprehensive set of comorbidity measures for use with large administrative inpatient datasets. The study involved clinical and empirical review of comorbidity measures, development of a framework that attempts to segregate comorbidities from other aspects of the patient's condition, development of a comorbidity algorithm, and testing on heterogeneous and homogeneous patient groups. Data were drawn from all adult, nonmaternal inpatients from 438 acute care hospitals in California in 1992 (n = 1,779,167). Outcome measures were those commonly available in administrative data: length of stay, hospital charges, and in-hospital death. A comprehensive set of 30 comorbidity measures was developed. The comorbidities were associated with substantial increases in length of stay, hospital charges, and mortality both for heterogeneous and homogeneous disease groups. Several comorbidities are described that are important predictors of outcomes, yet commonly are not measured. These include mental disorders, drug and alcohol abuse, obesity, coagulopathy, weight loss, and fluid and electrolyte disorders. The comorbidities had independent effects on outcomes and probably should not be simplified as an index because they affect outcomes differently among different patient groups. The present method addresses some of the limitations of previous measures. It is based on a comprehensive approach to identifying comorbidities and separates them from the primary reason for hospitalization, resulting in an expanded set of comorbidities that easily is applied without further refinement to administrative data for a wide range of diseases.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- The importance of classifying initial co-morbidity in evaluating the outcome of diabetes mellitusPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Taking Health Status Into Account When Setting Capitation RatesJAMA, 1996
- The Importance of Comorbidities in Explaining Differences in Patient CostsMedical Care, 1996
- Severity Measurement Methods and Judging Hospital Death Rates for PneumoniaMedical Care, 1996
- Surgical Rates and Operative Mortality for Open and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in MarylandNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- The Importance of Co-existent Disease in the Occurrence of Postoperative Complications and One-Year Recovery in Patients Undergoing Total Hip ReplacementMedical Care, 1993
- Why Do Sicker Patients Cost More? A Charge-Based Analysis of Patients Undergoing ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, 1993
- Contribution of a Measure of Disease Complexity (COMPLEX) to Prediction of Outcome and Charges Among Hospitalized PatientsMayo Clinic Proceedings, 1992
- Patterns of care related to age of men with prostate cancerCancer, 1991
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987