Ethical Principles and Evaluation Standards

1 December 1992

journal article
research article
Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation Review

Vol. 16 (6) , 650-663
https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x9201600605

Abstract

This study asked three questions: (a) What ethical principles are available to guide program evaluators? (b) how do the standards developed by the Joint Committee on Standards match up with ethical principles? and (c) what are the implications for refinement of the standards, training evaluators, and practicing evaluation? Kitchener's five ethical principles: autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, justice, and fidelity appear to have relevance for evaluation practice. Although consumers and novices were less likely to reach consensus than were experts, professional evaluators reached consensus in matching the standards to the ethical principles. The results also indicate not all of the Kitchener's principles are fully represented in the standards.

Keywords

This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:

The changing face of educational evaluation
Theory Into Practice, 1991
Photography and Ethics in Evaluation
Evaluation Review, 1990
Recapturing Moral Discourse in Evaluation
Educational Researcher, 1989
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Evaluation Review, 1987
Confessions of two applied researchers in search of principles
Evaluation and Program Planning, 1986
Alternative systems of ethics and their application to education and evaluation
Evaluation and Program Planning, 1985
Some characteristics of moral problems in evaluation practice
Evaluation and Program Planning, 1985
Analyzing mental health evaluation:
Evaluation and Program Planning, 1985
Intuition, Critical Evaluation and Ethical Principles: The Foundation for Ethical Decisions in Counseling Psychology
The Counseling Psychologist, 1984