Adolescent Immunization Practices
Open Access
- 1 May 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
- Vol. 155 (5) , 566-571
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.155.5.566
Abstract
Background Adolescent immunization rates remain low. Hence, a better understanding of the factors that influence adolescent immunization is needed. Objective To assess the adolescent immunization practices of US physicians. Design and Setting A 24-item survey mailed in 1997 to a national sample of 1480 pediatricians and family physicians living in the United States, randomly selected from the American Medical Association's Master List of Physicians. Participants Of 1110 physicians (75%) who responded, 761 met inclusion criteria. Outcome Measures Immunization practices and policies, use of tracking and recall, opinions about school-based immunizations, and reasons for not providing particular immunizations to eligible adolescents. Results Seventy-nine percent of physicians reported using protocols for adolescent immunization, and 82% recommended hepatitis B immunization for all eligible adolescents. Those who did not routinely immunize adolescents often cited insufficient insurance coverage for immunizations. While 42% of physicians reported that they review the immunization status of adolescent patients at acute illness visits, only 24% immunized eligible adolescents during such visits. Twenty-one percent used immunization tracking and recall systems. Though 84% preferred that immunizations be administered at their practice, 71% of physicians considered schools, and 63% considered teen clinics to be acceptable alternative adolescent immunization sites. However, many had concerns about continuity of care for adolescents receiving immunizations in school. Conclusions Most physicians supported adolescent immunization efforts. Barriers preventing adolescent immunization included financial barriers, record scattering, lack of tracking and recall, and missed opportunities. School-based immunization programs were acceptable to most physicians, despite concerns about continuity of care. Further research is needed to determine whether interventions that have successfully increased infant immunization rates are also effective for adolescents.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Randomized Study of Tracking With Outreach and Provider Prompting to Improve Immunization Coverage and Primary CarePediatrics, 1999
- Childhood Vaccination Successes, Yes, But the Job Is Not FinishedPediatric Annals, 1998
- Immunization Registries: The Cornerstone of Childhood Immunization in the 21st CenturyPediatric Annals, 1998
- Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Letters, Automated Telephone Messages, or Both for Underimmunized Children in a Health Maintenance OrganizationPediatrics, 1998
- A National Survey to Understand Why Physicians Defer Childhood ImmunizationsArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1997
- Computer-generated recall letters for underimmunized children: how cost-effective?The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 1997
- Development of a vaccine tracking system to improve the rate of age-appropriate primary immunization in children of lower socioeconomic statusThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1995
- AMA Guidelines for Adolescent Preventive Services (GAPS): Recommendations and RationalePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- A Randomized Trial of the Effectiveness of Computer-Generated Telephone Messages in Increasing Immunization Visits Among Preschool ChildrenArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1994
- Immunization Practices of Primary Care Practitioners and Their Relation to Immunization LevelsArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1994