Dose‐Finding Based on Efficacy–Toxicity Trade‐Offs

Top Cited Papers
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Summary We present an adaptive Bayesian method for dose‐finding in phase I/II clinical trials based on trade‐offs between the probabilities of treatment efficacy and toxicity. The method accommodates either trinary or bivariate binary outcomes, as well as efficacy probabilities that possibly are nonmonotone in dose. Doses are selected for successive patient cohorts based on a set of efficacy–toxicity trade‐off contours that partition the two‐dimensional outcome probability domain. Priors are established by solving for hyperparameters that optimize the fit of the model to elicited mean outcome probabilities. For trinary outcomes, the new algorithm is compared to the method of Thall and Russell (1998, Biometrics54, 251–264) by application to a trial of rapid treatment for ischemic stroke. The bivariate binary outcome case is illustrated by a trial of graft‐versus‐host disease treatment in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Computer simulations show that, under a wide rage of dose‐outcome scenarios, the new method has high probabilities of making correct decisions and treats most patients at doses with desirable efficacy–toxicity trade‐offs.

This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit: