Verification of Precipitation Forecasts over the Alpine Region Using a High-Density Observing Network
- 1 April 2002
- journal article
- Published by American Meteorological Society in Weather and Forecasting
- Vol. 17 (2) , 238-249
- https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2002)017<0238:vopfot>2.0.co;2
Abstract
The demand for verification of forecasting systems to ascertain their strengths and weaknesses is increasing dramatically as models evolve more rapidly. Precipitation forecasts have always been of great interest to forecasters because they influence daily life. The recent flooding over Europe has also shown how important it is to know how models can reproduce these events. The issue of precipitation verification is addressed here, starting from the assumption that model spatial scales have to be verified against data representing similar scales. Only in this way may the skill of forecasting system used herein be determined. The performance of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts model in predicting precipitation is discussed. The study concentrates on the period September to November 1999 during which high-density observations were available for the Alps. The high-resolution observing network over the Alpine region has been used to reconstruct a precipitation analysis that contains smoothed small-scale variability and represents with sufficient accuracy the average behavior of the observed field in the model grid box. The precipitation forecast is verified against both the precipitation analysis and the surface synoptic observations (SYNOP) available in real time via the Global Telecommunication System. Both verification approaches show that for the Alpine region, during autumn 1999, the model overestimates the precipitation amount. Overestimation is smaller when the forecast is compared with the precipitation analysis. It is also shown that verification against irregular and scattered observations (SYNOP data) is highly influenced by the variability of the precipitation in a grid box. A precipitation analysis is, therefore, important if model skill has to be defined.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts over the United States by the ECMWF Ensemble Prediction SystemMonthly Weather Review, 2001
- Revision of convection, radiation and cloud schemes in the ECMWF Integrated Forecasting SystemQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2000
- A parametrization of the effects of cloud and precipitation overlap for use in general‐circulation modelsQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2000
- Implementation of the Semi-Lagrangian Method in a High-Resolution Version of the ECMWF Forecast ModelMonthly Weather Review, 1995
- What Is a Good Forecast? An Essay on the Nature of Goodness in Weather ForecastingWeather and Forecasting, 1993
- Forecast verification: Its Complexity and DimensionalityMonthly Weather Review, 1991
- The Critical Success Index as an Indicator of Warning SkillWeather and Forecasting, 1990
- A Method of Relating General Circulation Model Simulated Climate to the Observed Local Climate. Part I: Seasonal StatisticsJournal of Climate, 1990
- A General Framework for Forecast VerificationMonthly Weather Review, 1987
- The Statistical Problem of Climate Inversion: Determination of the Relationship between Local and Large-Scale ClimateMonthly Weather Review, 1984