EMOTIONAL AND ETHICAL QUAGMIRES IN RETURNING TO THE FIELD
- 1 April 1995
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Contemporary Ethnography
- Vol. 24 (1) , 68-98
- https://doi.org/10.1177/089124195024001003
Abstract
When returning to the site of prior research, ethnographers may find themselves embroiled in emotional and ethical quandaries with the people about whom they have written. This article details the conversations and emotional conflicts that erupted suddenly when I returned to a community about which I had published a previous ethnographic account. Writing the story gave me an opportunity to examine orthodox ethnographic research practices, such as omitting the autobiographical self and emotional responses from ethnographic texts. The return visit helped clarify connections between my personal life and the way I conducted fieldwork in this community, and it led me to recommend that ethnographic practices include an examination of how our experiences connect us with those we study rather than emphasize only how they set us apart.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- TEN LIES OF ETHNOGRAPHYJournal of Contemporary Ethnography, 1993
- The “post” phase of deviant careers: Reintegrating drug traffickersDeviant Behavior, 1992
- Trash on the CornerJournal of Contemporary Ethnography, 1992
- Street Corner Society RevisitedJournal of Contemporary Ethnography, 1992
- ON FIELDWORKJournal of Contemporary Ethnography, 1989
- Covert Participant ObservationUrban Life, 1980
- "You Still Takin' Notes?" Fieldwork and Problems of Informed ConsentSocial Problems, 1980
- Sex and Gender in Field ResearchUrban Life, 1977
- Survival in the field: Implications of personal experience in field workTheory and Society, 1975
- Comments on "Secret Observation"Social Problems, 1962