Severe Community-acquired Pneumonia
Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Thoracic Society in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 166 (5) , 717-723
- https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.2102084
Abstract
Despite careful evaluation of changes in hospital care for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), little is known about intensive care unit (ICU) use in the treatment of this disease. There are criteria that define CAP as “severe,” but evaluation of their predictive value is limited. We compared characteristics, course, and outcome of inpatients who did (n = 170) and did not (n = 1,169) receive ICU care in the Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team prospective cohort. We also assessed the predictive characteristics of four prediction rules (the original and revised American Thoracic Society criteria, the British Thoracic Society criteria, and the Pneumonia Severity Index [PSI]) for ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, medical complications, and death (as proxies for severe CAP). ICU patients were more likely to be admitted from home and had more comorbid conditions. Reasons for ICU admission included respiratory failure (57%), hemodynamic monitoring (32%), and shock (16%). ICU patients incurred longer hospital stays (23.2 vs. 9.1 days, p < 0.001), higher hospital costs ($21,144 vs. $5,785, p < 0.001), more nonpulmonary organ dysfunction, and higher hospital mortality (18.2 vs. 5.0%, p < 0.001). Although ICU patients were sicker, 27% were of low risk (PSI Risk Classes I–III). Severity-adjusted ICU admission rates varied across institutions, but mechanical ventilation rates did not. The revised American Thoracic Society criteria rule was the best discriminator of ICU admission and mechanical ventilation (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.68 and 0.74, respectively) but none of the prediction rules were particularly good. The PSI was the best predictor of medical complications and death (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.65 and 0.75, respectively), but again, none of the prediction rules were particularly good. In conclusion, ICU use for CAP is common and expensive but admission rates are variable. Clinical prediction rules for severe CAP do not appear adequately robust to guide clinical care at the current time.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Prediction Rule to Identify Low-Risk Patients with Community-Acquired PneumoniaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Re-evaluation of pneumonia requiring admission to an intensive care unit: a prospective study.Thorax, 1994
- Bacteraemic pneumococcal pneumonia: A continuously evolving diseaseJournal of Infection, 1992
- The aetiology, management and outcome of severe community-acquired pneumonia on the intensive care unitRespiratory Medicine, 1992
- Community-acquired pneumoniaCritical Care Medicine, 1990
- New and Emerging Etiologies for Community-Acquired Pneumonia with Implications for TherapyMedicine, 1990
- Bacteremic Pneumococcal Pneumonia in Sweden: Clinical Course and Outcome and Comparison with Non-bacteremic Pneumococcal and Mycoplasmal PneumoniasScandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1988
- Pneumonia: A Deadly Disease despite Intensive Care TreatmentScandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1986
- Pneumococcal bacteraemia: 325 episodes diagnosed at St Thomas's Hospital.BMJ, 1985
- Severe Community-acquired Pneumonia: Factors Influencing Need of Intensive Care Treatment and PrognosisArchives of Physiology and Biochemistry, 1985