A comparison of 100 ug oral misoprostol every 3 hours and 6 hours for labor induction: A randomized controlled trial
- 1 December 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research
- Vol. 28 (6) , 308-312
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1341-8076.2002.00061.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol tablets in induction of labour at termBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2001
- A randomized comparison of oral and intravaginal misoprostol for labor inductionPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2000
- Oral or vaginal misoprostol administration for induction of labor: a randomized, double-blind trialPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1998
- A masked randomized comparison of oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol for labor induction*1Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1998
- Oral administration of misoprostol for labor induction: A randomized controlled trialPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1998
- A Comparison of Intravaginal Misoprostol and Intracervical Prostaglandin E2 Gel for Ripening of Unfavorable Cervix and Labor InductionJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 1997
- Oral or vaginal misoprostol for induction of laborInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1997
- Comparison of labor induction with misoprostol vs. oxytocin/prostaglandin E2 in term pregnancyInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1996
- Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labor: A Randomized Controlled TrialObstetrics & Gynecology, 1996
- Cervical Priming With Oral Misoprostol in Pre-Labor Rupture of Membranes at TermObstetrics & Gynecology, 1996