Long-term Outcome in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Admitted to Hospitals With and Without On-site Cardiac Catheterization Facilities
- 16 September 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 96 (6) , 1770-1775
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.96.6.1770
Abstract
Background Previous studies have documented the strong association between availability of on-site cardiac catheterization facilities and increased use of coronary angiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Although these studies have shown little influence of the availability of catheterization labs on hospital mortality, no long-term follow-up has been reported. Methods and Results From a cohort of 12 331 AMI patients admitted to 19 Seattle area hospitals, we compared long-term outcome in 7985 patients admitted to hospitals with and 4346 patients admitted to hospitals without on-site catheterization labs. During the index hospitalization, patients admitted to hospitals with on-site catheterization were more likely to undergo coronary angiography (67.1% versus 39.3%, P <.0001), coronary angioplasty (32.5% versus 13.2%, P <.0001), or coronary bypass surgery (12.5% versus 9.5%, P <.0001). At 3-year follow-up, patients admitted to hospitals with on-site catheterization labs were more likely to undergo postdischarge angiography (19.2% versus 15.2%, P =.0001) and coronary angioplasty (11.6% versus 8.2%, P <.0001). This was associated with approximately $2500.00 per patient in higher cumulative costs. Despite this higher rate of procedure use, there was no association between admission to a hospital with on-site catheterization facilities and lower long-term mortality (multivariate hazard ratio, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.1., the hazard being associated with admission to hospitals with on-site catheterization facilities). Conclusions In an urban area with unconstrained patient transfer mechanisms and high overall cardiac procedure use rates, AMI patients admitted to hospitals without on-site catheterization facilities were managed with fewer procedures during hospitalization and follow-up. This more conservative treatment approach was not associated with any observed increase in long-term mortality.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Department of Veterans AffairsMedical Care, 1997
- Variation among Hospitals in Coronary-Angiography Practices and Outcomes after Myocardial Infarction in a Large Health Maintenance OrganizationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Regional Variation across the United States in the Management of Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Comparison of 15-year survival for men and women after initial medical or surgical treatment for coronary artery disease: A CASS registry studyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1995
- Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists CollaborationPublished by Elsevier ,1994
- The Association between On-Site Cardiac Catheterization Facilities and the Use of Coronary Angiography after Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- High-Technology Cardiac ProceduresPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1993
- A Comparison of Immediate Angioplasty with Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Myocardial infarction triage and intervention project—Phase I: Patient characteristics and feasibility of prehospital initiation of thrombolytic therapyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1990
- Twelve-Year Follow-up of Survival in the Randomized European Coronary Surgery StudyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988