A Survey of Recent Econometric Work on the NAIRU
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Journal of Economic Studies
- Vol. 20 (1/2)
- https://doi.org/10.1108/eum0000000000166
Abstract
Compares Layard, Nickell and Jackman′s empirical model of UK unemployment with other time‐series econometric studies to assess whether the balance of evidence supports their analysis. Compares estimates of the effect on the UK NAIRU of factors such as benefits, union strength, mismatch, taxes, the exchange rate and hysteresis. Highlights and discusses differences of approach – e.g. to the exogeneity of the real exchange rate, the permanence of wedge effects and to hysteresis. Empirical results are found to be very sensitive to the precise way in which models are formulated and estimated. This suggests that any estimates of the level of the NAIRU are likely to be unreliable. Finds however, considerable empirical support for the kind of interactions between wages, prices and unemployment that Layard, Nickell and Jackman include in their model.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Role of the Real Exchange Rate and Capacity Utilisation in Convergence to the NairuThe Economic Journal, 1991
- ON ERROR CORRECTION MODELS: SPECIFICATION, INTERPRETATION, ESTIMATIONJournal of Economic Surveys, 1991
- THE UNEMPLOYMENT-VACANCY RELATION IN THE UKScottish Journal of Political Economy, 1990
- Comparative Properties of Models of the UK EconomyNational Institute Economic Review, 1990
- The Wage CurveThe Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 1990
- Insider Forces and Wage DeterminationThe Economic Journal, 1990
- Mrs Thatcher's Economic Policies 1979-1987Economic Policy, 1987
- Wage ModelsNational Institute Economic Review, 1987
- Unemployment in BritainEconomica, 1986
- The Causes of British UnemploymentNational Institute Economic Review, 1985