Selective reminding test: An examination of the equivalence of four forms
- 1 June 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
- Vol. 7 (3) , 251-263
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01688638508401258
Abstract
Four forms of a selective reminding test were administered to 20 male and 20 female subjects 1 week apart in one of four orders determined by a Latin square. On many of the dependent measures, Form 1 was significantly more difficult than the other three forms, which were equivalent in difficulty. For many of the measures, performance on the first test administered was significantly lower than that on the third and fourth tests administered. Performance on the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th tests administered was similar. Males made significantly more intrusions than females. Interclass correlation coefficients ranged from 414 to 654. Implications for clinical use of the selective reminding tests are discussed.This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mathematical and empirical development of a test of memory for clinical and research use.Psychological Bulletin, 1983
- Memory Enhancement with Oral Physostigmine in Alzheimer's DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Measuring long-term memory storage and retrieval in childrenJournal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1982
- Intrusions as a sign of Alzheimer dementia chemical and pathological verificationAnnals of Neurology, 1982
- Effects of physostigmine and lecithin on memory in Alzheimer diseaseAnnals of Neurology, 1979
- Memory Enhancement After Physostigmine Treatment in the Amnesic SyndromeArchives of Neurology, 1977
- Components of verbal learning in children: Analysis by selective remindingJournal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1974
- Amnesic Syndrome: Consolidation or Retrieval?Nature, 1970
- Free recall of trilingual listsCognitive Psychology, 1970
- Retention of information under conditions approaching a steady state.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961