The influence of anaesthetic technique upon the immune response to hysterectomy

Open Access
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Earlier studies on propofol have shown increased percentages of T helper cells after minor surgery. In this study, the effects of propofol infusion anaesthesia on the immune response were compared with those of combined isoflurane anaesthesia in 30patients (median age 47 years, ASA 1–2) undergoing major surgery. The total dose of propofol in the propofol infusion group of 15 women was 860 mg (range 540–1520 mg) and the median end-expiratory isoflurane concentration in the combined isoflurane group of 15 women was 0.6% (range 0.5–0.8). The following were measured; leucocyte and differential counts; percentages of lymphocyte subpopulations (CDS, CD4, CD8, CD 19, CD 16 and HLA-DR + CD3); phytohaemagglutinin-, concanavalin A-, and pokeweed mitogen-induced and unstimulated lymphocyte proliferation; plasma interleukin-6; serum group II phospholipase A2, C-reactive protein and cortisol concentrations. Measurements were made pre-operatively, at the end of the operation and on the first and fifth postoperative days. No statistically significant overall differences were observed in the immune response between the groups. The serum cortisol response was weaker in the propofol group than in the isoflurane group (p < 0.05). Time-related changes were seen within the groups.