Competency Standards – a Help or a Hindrance? An Australian Perspective
Open Access
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Vocational Aspect of Education
- Vol. 47 (2) , 141-151
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0305787950470203
Abstract
The mere existence of competency standards for an occupation is not, in itself, enough to tell us whether they will be a help or a hindrance for education and training providers. Instead, that will depend on what sort of competency standards they are and how they are being used by the education and training providers. This paper will describe, firstly, the types of competency standards that would be a hindrance for vocational education and training providers and those that would be a help. Secondly, assuming that competency standards of the helpful type are available, the paper will outline the ways of using them that would still be detrimental to vocational education and training, and contrast this with ways of using them so as to improve the provision of vocational education and training. As against the widely held belief that competency standards require a totally new approach to vocational education and training, this paper argues that this is true only of the type of competency standards that are a hindrance. The type of competency standards that are helpful to vocational education and training provide a powerful means of improving what has always been best practice in the design, delivery and assessment of vocational education and training courses.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Cognitive Psychology of Knowledge: Basic Research Findings and Educational ImplicationsAustralian Journal of Education, 1991
- The Extent to Which Critical Thinking Is Subject-Specific: Further ClarificationEducational Researcher, 1990
- Critical Thinking and Subject Specificity: Clarification and Needed ResearchEducational Researcher, 1989