Did Modeling Overestimate the Transmission Potential of Pandemic (H1N1-2009)? Sample Size Estimation for Post-Epidemic Seroepidemiological Studies
Open Access
- 24 March 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 6 (3) , e17908
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017908
Abstract
Seroepidemiological studies before and after the epidemic wave of H1N1-2009 are useful for estimating population attack rates with a potential to validate early estimates of the reproduction number, R, in modeling studies. Since the final epidemic size, the proportion of individuals in a population who become infected during an epidemic, is not the result of a binomial sampling process because infection events are not independent of each other, we propose the use of an asymptotic distribution of the final size to compute approximate 95% confidence intervals of the observed final size. This allows the comparison of the observed final sizes against predictions based on the modeling study (R = 1.15, 1.40 and 1.90), which also yields simple formulae for determining sample sizes for future seroepidemiological studies. We examine a total of eleven published seroepidemiological studies of H1N1-2009 that took place after observing the peak incidence in a number of countries. Observed seropositive proportions in six studies appear to be smaller than that predicted from R = 1.40; four of the six studies sampled serum less than one month after the reported peak incidence. The comparison of the observed final sizes against R = 1.15 and 1.90 reveals that all eleven studies appear not to be significantly deviating from the prediction with R = 1.15, but final sizes in nine studies indicate overestimation if the value R = 1.90 is used. Sample sizes of published seroepidemiological studies were too small to assess the validity of model predictions except when R = 1.90 was used. We recommend the use of the proposed approach in determining the sample size of post-epidemic seroepidemiological studies, calculating the 95% confidence interval of observed final size, and conducting relevant hypothesis testing instead of the use of methods that rely on a binomial proportion.Keywords
This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- Real-time forecasting of an epidemic using a discrete time stochastic model: a case study of pandemic influenza (H1N1-2009)BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 2011
- The Infection Attack Rate and Severity of 2009 Pandemic H1N1 Influenza in Hong KongClinical Infectious Diseases, 2010
- Seroepidemiology of pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 virus infections in Pune, IndiaBMC Infectious Diseases, 2010
- Cross-Reactive Antibody Responses to the 2009 Pandemic H1N1 Influenza VirusNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- The Transmissibility and Control of Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) VirusScience, 2009
- Estimation of the reproductive number and the serial interval in early phase of the 2009 influenza A/H1N1 pandemic in the USAInfluenza and Other Respiratory Viruses, 2009
- Initial human transmission dynamics of the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus in North AmericaInfluenza and Other Respiratory Viruses, 2009
- Pandemic Potential of a Strain of Influenza A (H1N1): Early FindingsScience, 2009
- Emergence and pandemic potential of swine-origin H1N1 influenza virusNature, 2009
- Time Lines of Infection and Disease in Human Influenza: A Review of Volunteer Challenge StudiesAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2008