The Individual Travel-Cost Method and the Value of Recreation: The Case of the Montgomery and Lancaster Canals
- 1 September 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy
- Vol. 8 (3) , 315-326
- https://doi.org/10.1068/c080315
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the use of the individual travel-cost method by using it to value informal recreation along the Montgomery and Lancaster Canals. Informal recreation covers all activities such as walking and sightseeing, for which no price or entry fee is charged. Consumer surplus on each type of informal recreation was estimated by the individual travel-cost method: Assessment of how much people were prepared to pay to undertake different activities. The Montgomery and Lancaster Canals provide examples against which to compare consumer surplus from informal recreation against public subsidies for their operation.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Option value and non user benefits of wildlife conservationJournal of Rural Studies, 1989
- A Comparison of User Benefits and Costs of Nature Conservation at Three Nature ReservesRegional Studies, 1988
- The Impact of Agricultural Policy on the Costs of Nature ConservationLand Economics, 1988
- The value of changes in deer hunting quality: a travel cost approachApplied Economics, 1988
- Selection and Recreation DemandAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1988
- The Generalized Travel Cost Model and Water Quality Benefits: A ReconsiderationSouthern Economic Journal, 1985
- Valuing Option, Existence, and Bequest Demands for WildernessLand Economics, 1984
- Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometricsPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1983