Hybrid and non‐hybrid evaluation models for predicting outdoor recreation behavior: A test of predictive ability
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Leisure Sciences
- Vol. 9 (2) , 67-76
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01490408709512147
Abstract
This paper compares the internal validity, external validity and ease of implementation of different types of compositional, decompositional and hybrid evaluation models in the context of recreational trip behavior. The results indicate that the full‐profile conjoint measurement model outperforms the self‐explicated models, the hybrid evaluation models and the trade‐off conjoint measurement model in terms of both internal and external validity, although the models differ less in terms of external validity. However, in terms of ease of implementation, the decompositional models may be less attractive.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Modelling recreation choice: A case study of management alternatives in ChicagoRegional Studies, 1984
- An Empirical Comparison of the Predictive Validity of Self-Explicated, Huber-Hybrid, Traditional Conjoint, and Hybrid Conjoint ModelsJournal of Marketing Research, 1983
- Attributes of Chicago trail areasLeisure Sciences, 1983
- Preferences for Recreational Environments: Theoretical Considerations and a Comparison of ModelsLeisure Sciences, 1982
- Models of recreational trip distributionRegional Studies, 1981
- Multi-Attribute Utility Models: A Review of Field and Field-Like StudiesManagement Science, 1974
- An empirical comparison of five utility models for predicting job preferencesOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1971
- A study of self-explicated utility modelsBehavioral Science, 1970
- A study of subjective evaluation modelsBehavioral Science, 1969
- A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF GRAVITY AND SYSTEM THEORY MODELS FOR STATEWIDE RECREATIONAL TRAFFIC FLOWS†Journal of Regional Science, 1966