Social, Institutional, and Economic Barriers to the Exercise of Patients' Rights
- 22 February 1996
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 334 (8) , 532-534
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199602223340812
Abstract
During the past 30 years, the autonomy of patients has displaced beneficence on the part of physicians as the chief tenet of medical ethics.1 Respect for patients' autonomy is now considered fundamental to the practice of medicine. It is best exemplified by the universally recognized doctrine of informed consent. Patients have the right to information about their own medical care, as well as the right to accept or reject any recommended treatment. The physician formulates alternatives for dealing with a medical problem and advises the patient about the risks and benefits of these alternatives. The choice among them is the . . .Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patient Advocacy in the 1990sNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Extreme Risk — The New Corporate Proposition for PhysiciansNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Managed Care and the Morality of the MarketplaceNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- The Relation between Health Insurance Coverage and Clinical Outcomes among Women with Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Frequency and Costs of Diagnostic Imaging in Office Practice — A Comparison of Self-Referring and Radiologist-Referring PhysiciansNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Transfers to a Public HospitalNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- ArroganceNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980