Suspected Acute Colon Diverticulitis: Imaging with Low-Dose Unenhanced Multi–Detector Row CT
- 1 October 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 237 (1) , 189-196
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2371041432
Abstract
PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced low-dose multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) with those of contrast material-enhanced standard-dose multi-detector row CT in patients suspected of having acute diverticulitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. One hundred ten consecutive patients (40 men, 70 women; age range, 30-82 years; mean, 57 years) suspected of having acute diverticulitis underwent unenhanced multi-detector row CT with 4 x 2.5-mm collimation, 120 kVp, and 30 effective mAs, as well as contrast-enhanced standard-dose multi-detector row CT with the same parameters but with 120 mAs. All scans were independently read by four readers. Intra- and interobserver agreements were calculated with the kappa statistic. Contrast-enhanced standard-dose scans read by three other experts and considered together with results from colonoscopy, surgery, and pathologic evaluation were used as reference. Differences in sensitivity and specificity between readers, radiation doses, and reading sessions were investigated. Pearson exact test and logistic regression models were used. RESULTS: Colon diverticulitis was present in 39 patients (34%) and was graded as mild in 22 patients (56%) and severe in 17 (44%). Agreement within and between readers was good to excellent. No significant difference was observed in sensitivity (P ranging from .081 to >.99) or in specificity (P ranging from .326 to >.99) for any sign or overall diagnosis between radiation doses by all readers, except wall thickening, which for one reader had a higher specificity at low dose than at standard dose (P = .025). No significant difference in misclassification was detected between doses, regardless of the reader (P ranging from .481 to >.99). At both doses, the most predictive sign for acute diverticulitis was retroperitoneal fat stranding (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Low-dose unenhanced multi-detector row CT has a diagnostic performance similar to that of contrast-enhanced standard-dose multi-detector row CT in patients suspected of having acute diverticulitis.Comparative StudyJournal Articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publisheKeywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Acute Left Colonic Diverticulitis: Can CT Findings Be Used to Predict Recurrence?American Journal of Roentgenology, 2004
- Dose Reduction in Multidetector CT Using Attenuation-Based Online Tube Current ModulationAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2003
- Low-Dose Unenhanced Multidetector CT of Patients with Suspected Renal ColicAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2003
- Cancer Risk from Low-Level RadiationAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2002
- Frequency, Sensitivity, and Specificity of Individual Signs of Diverticulitis on Thin-Section Helical CT with Colonic Contrast Material: Experience with 312 CasesAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2002
- Dose and Pitch Relationship for a Particular Multislice CT ScannerAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2001
- Common Terminology for Single and Multislice Helical CTAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2001
- CT evaluation of appendicitis and diverticulitis. Part II: DiverticulitisEmergency Radiology, 2000
- Helical CT with only colonic contrast material for diagnosing diverticulitis: prospective evaluation of 150 patients.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1998
- Acute DiverticulitisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998