Antenatal minimal hydronephrosis: is its follow-up an unnecessary cause of concern?
- 18 August 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Prenatal Diagnosis
- Vol. 19 (8) , 701-705
- https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0223(199908)19:8<701::aid-pd621>3.0.co;2-5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Vesicoureteric reflux in the newborn: relationship to fetal renal pelvic diameter.Pediatric Nephrology, 1997
- FETAL PYELECTASIS: COMPARISON OF POSTNATAL RENAL PATHOLOGY WITH UNILATERAL AND BILATERAL PYELECTASISPrenatal Diagnosis, 1997
- Clinical relevance and implications of antenatal hydronephrosisArchives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal & Neonatal, 1997
- Minimal Hydronephrosis in the Fetus: Clinical Significance and Implications for ManagementJournal of Urology, 1996
- Fetal pyelectasis: Is it always “physiologic”?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- Mild dilatation of the fetal kidney: a follow-up studyBritish Journal of Urology, 1994
- The psychological effects of false‐positive results in prenatal screening for fetal abnormality: A prospective studyPrenatal Diagnosis, 1992
- Presenting a routine screening test in antenatal care: Practice observedPublic Health, 1992
- Multicentre study of antenatal calyceal dilatation detected by ultrasoundThe Lancet, 1990
- Urinary tract dilatation in utero: classification and clinical applications.Radiology, 1986