Valuing lives equally: Defensible premise or unwarranted compromise?
- 6 February 2008
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
- Vol. 36 (2) , 125-138
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-008-9034-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mortality-risk Valuation and Age: Stated Preference EvidenceReview of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2007
- Age Differences in the Value of Statistical Life: Revealed Preference EvidenceReview of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2007
- Valuing lives equally: Distributional weights for welfare analysisEconomics Letters, 2006
- Lives, Life-Years, and Willingness to PayColumbia Law Review, 2004
- The Value of a Statistical Life: A Critical Review of Market Estimates Throughout the WorldJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2003
- The ‘fair innings argument’ deserves a fairer hearing! comments by Alan Williams on Nord and JohannessonHealth Economics, 2001
- Rational Risk PolicyPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1998
- The Value of Safety: Results of a National Sample SurveyThe Economic Journal, 1985
- Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of UtilityJournal of Political Economy, 1955