Intensity of Continuous Renal-Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Patients
Top Cited Papers
- 22 October 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 361 (17) , 1627-1638
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0902413
Abstract
The optimal intensity of continuous renal-replacement therapy remains unclear. We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial to compare the effect of this therapy, delivered at two different levels of intensity, on 90-day mortality among critically ill patients with acute kidney injury.This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intensity of Renal Support in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney InjuryNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Standard versus High-Dose CVVHDF for ICU-Related Acute Renal FailureJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2008
- Statistics in Medicine — Reporting of Subgroup Analyses in Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Changes in the incidence and outcome for early acute kidney injury in a cohort of Australian intensive care unitsCritical Care, 2007
- Adding a dialysis dose to continuous hemofiltration increases survival in patients with acute renal failureKidney International, 2006
- An assessment of the RIFLE criteria for acute renal failure in hospitalized patients*Critical Care Medicine, 2006
- RIFLE criteria for acute kidney injury are associated with hospital mortality in critically ill patients: a cohort analysisCritical Care, 2006
- Acute Renal Failure in Critically Ill PatientsA Multinational, Multicenter StudyJAMA, 2005
- Effects of early high-volume continuous venovenous hemofiltration on survival and recovery of renal function in intensive care patients with acute renal failure: A prospective, randomized trialCritical Care Medicine, 2002
- Effects of different doses in continuous veno-venous haemofiltration on outcomes of acute renal failure: a prospective randomised trialThe Lancet, 2000