Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: Equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques
- 1 November 2005
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Radiotherapy and Oncology
- Vol. 77 (2) , 148-156
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2005.09.011
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for oropharyngeal carcinoma: impact of tumor volumeInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2004
- A comparison of forward and inverse treatment planning for intensity-modulated radiotherapy of head and neck cancerRadiotherapy and Oncology, 2003
- Computer optimization of class solutions designed on a beam segmentation basisRadiotherapy and Oncology, 2003
- Patterns of failure in patients receiving definitive and postoperative IMRT for head-and-neck cancerInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2003
- Determination and delineation of nodal target volumes for head-and-neck cancer based on patterns of failure in patients receiving definitive and postoperative IMRTInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2002
- Delivery of intensity‐modulated radiation therapy with a conventional multileaf collimator: Comparison of dynamic and segmental methodsMedical Physics, 2001
- Intensity-modulated radiation therapy reduces late salivary toxicity without compromising tumor control in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma: a comparison with conventional techniquesRadiotherapy and Oncology, 2001
- A treatment planning comparison of 3D conformal therapy, intensity modulated photon therapy and proton therapy for treatment of advanced head and neck tumoursRadiotherapy and Oncology, 2001
- Fitting of normal tissue tolerance data to an analytic functionInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1991
- Dosimetric Precision Requirements in Radiation TherapyActa Radiologica: Oncology, 1984