Multiple coherence of cerebral blood flow velocity in humans
Open Access
- 1 July 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physiological Society in American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
- Vol. 291 (1) , H251-H259
- https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.01348.2005
Abstract
The coherence function has been used in transfer function analysis of dynamic cerebral autoregulation to assess the statistical significance of spectral estimates of gain and phase frequency response. Interpretation of the coherence function and choice of confidence limits has not taken into account the intrinsic nonlinearity represented by changes in cerebrovascular resistance due to vasomotor activity. For small spontaneous changes in arterial blood pressure (ABP), the relationship between ABP and cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) can be linearized, showing that corresponding changes in cerebrovascular resistance should be included as a second input variable. In this case, the standard univariate coherence function needs to be replaced by the multiple coherence, which takes into account the contribution of both inputs to explain CBFV variability. With the use of two different indicators of cerebrovascular resistance index [CVRI = ABP/CBFV and the resistance-area product (RAP)], multiple coherences were calculated for 42 healthy control subjects, aged 20 to 40 yr (28 ± 4.6 yr, mean ± SD), at rest in the supine position. CBFV was measured in both middle cerebral arteries, and ABP was recorded noninvasively by finger photoplethysmography. Results for the ABP + RAP inputs show that the multiple coherence of CBFV for frequencies <0.05 Hz is significantly higher than the corresponding values obtained for univariate coherence ( P < 10−5). Corresponding results for the ABP + CVRI inputs confirm the principle of multiple coherence but are less useful due to the interdependence between CVRI, ABP, and CBFV. The main conclusion is that values of univariate coherence between ABP and CBFV should not be used to reject spectral estimates of gain and phase, derived from small fluctuations in ABP, because the true explained power of CBFV in healthy subjects is much higher than what has been usually predicted by the univariate coherence functions.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cerebral blood flow velocity during mental activation: interpretation with different models of the passive pressure-velocity relationshipJournal of Applied Physiology, 2005
- Middle cerebral artery flow velocity and pulse pressure during dynamic exercise in humansAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 2005
- Dynamic cardiorespiratory interaction during head-up tilt-mediated presyncopeAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 2004
- Impaired Cerebral Autoregulation in Patients With Malignant HypertensionCirculation, 2004
- Inflammatory gene expression by human colonic smooth muscle cellsAmerican Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 2004
- Cerebral Autoregulation in Carotid Artery Occlusive Disease Assessed From Spontaneous Blood Pressure Fluctuations by the Correlation Coefficient IndexStroke, 2003
- Dynamic Autoregulation Testing in Patients With Middle Cerebral Artery StenosisStroke, 2003
- Frequency Domain Analysis of Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity and its Correlation with Arterial Blood PressureJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 1998
- Analysis of cerebral blood flow autoregulation in neonatesIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1996
- Cerebral autoregulation dynamics in humans.Stroke, 1989