Will Pay-For-Performance And Quality Reporting Affect Health Care Disparities?
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 26 (3) , w405-w414
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.w405
Abstract
Pay-for-performance (P4P) and public quality-reporting programs can increase the quality of health care for the services being measured. However, unless carefully designed, these programs may have the unintended consequence of increasing racial and ethnic disparities. This paper describes ways in which P4P and public reporting programs may increase disparities and suggests ways in which programs might be designed that will make them likely to reduce, or at least not increase, disparities.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- General Internists’ Views On Pay-For-Performance And Public Reporting Of Quality Scores: A National SurveyHealth Affairs, 2007
- Pay for Performance in Commercial HMOsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Literacy and health outcomesJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2006
- Are Language Barriers Associated With Serious Medical Events in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients?Pediatrics, 2005
- Linking Compensation to Quality — Medicare Payments to PhysiciansNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Hospital Performance Reports: Impact On Quality, Market Share, And ReputationHealth Affairs, 2005
- Overcoming Disparities In U.S. Health CareHealth Affairs, 2005
- Physician Performance AssessmentMedical Care, 2003
- Effect of Patient Socioeconomic Status on Physician Profiles for Prevention, Disease Management, and Diagnostic Testing CostsMedical Care, 2002
- How to restore higher-powered incentives in multitask agenciesJournal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1999