The Organizational Construction of Hegemonic Masculinity: The Case of the US Navy
- 1 July 1996
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Gender, Work & Organization
- Vol. 3 (3) , 129-142
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.1996.tb00054.x
Abstract
This article examines the construction of hegemonic masculinity within the US Navy. Based on life history interviews with 27 male officers, this study explores alternative discourses and identities of officers from three different communities in the Navy: aviation, surface warfare, and the supply corps. Definitions of masculinity are relationally constructed through associations of difference: aviators tend to draw upon themes of autonomy and risk taking; surface warfare officers draw upon themes of perseverance and endurance; and supply officers draw upon themes of technical rationality. Further, these masculinities depend upon various contrasting definitions of femininity. Finally, this article explores a series of contradictions that threaten the secure construction of masculinity within this military culture.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Women in Military OccupationsWork, Employment & Society, 1995
- Theorizing Masculinities in Contemporary Social SciencePublished by SAGE Publications ,1994
- Naming Men as Men: Implications for Work, Organization and ManagementGender, Work & Organization, 1994
- MANAGEMENT, MASCULINITY AND MANIPULATION: FROM PATERNALISM TO CORPORATE STRATEGY IN FINANCIAL SERVICES IN BRITAIN*Journal of Management Studies, 1993
- Sexual orientation and military service: A social science perspective.American Psychologist, 1993
- Gay people and government security clearances: A social science perspective.American Psychologist, 1990
- 'Engineering Humour': Masculinity, Joking and Conflict in Shop-floor RelationsOrganization Studies, 1988
- Doing GenderGender & Society, 1987
- Military Socialization and MasculinityJournal of Social Issues, 1978
- The Naval Recruit Training Center: A Study of Role Assimilation in a Total Institution*Sociological Inquiry, 1967