Why Sackett's analysis of randomized controlled trials fails, but needn't.
- 3 October 2000
- journal article
- Vol. 163 (7) , 834-5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- For and against: Clinical equipoise and not the uncertainty principle is the moral underpinning of the randomised controlled trial FOR AGAINSTBMJ, 2000
- Why randomized controlled trials fail but needn't: 1. Failure to gain "coal-face" commitment and to use the uncertainty principle.2000
- Trials: the next 50 yearsBMJ, 1998
- Equipoise and the Ethics of Clinical ResearchNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987