Selection of Breeding Habitat by the Thrush Nightingale Luscinia luscinia and Its Position in Bird Communities
- 1 June 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by JSTOR in Ornis Scandinavica
- Vol. 11 (2) , 125-134
- https://doi.org/10.2307/3675919
Abstract
Certain factors which may be decisive in habitat selection by breeding thrush nightingales are studied. This species favors deciduous coppices which are usually low and shady. Some dense thickets providing good shelter are always present in the territories. A proportion of bare ground without field vegetation is also important because the species feeds mostly on the ground. The small coppices where territories are established occur in open environments, near water or fields; this improves the audibility of the bird''s song. The position of the thrush nightingale in the bird community is also presented. It belongs to the guild of ground feeders, but unlike most other species of this guild is strongly adapted for foraging inside woodlands. It is also partly able to utilize other zones of vegetation. It can sometimes forage in field vegetation, on branches and boughs of trees, or even in the air. Its main diet consists of insects, mostly lepidopteran larvae. In terms of habitat requirements and morphological similarities, the thrush nightingale has only 2 potential competitors, the robin Erithacus rubecula L. and the redwing Turdus iliacus L. The competition between these species seems usually to be weak. The effect of man on habitats is presumably the most important reason for population fluctuations of the thrush nightingale in Finland.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Niche Shifts in New Hebridean BirdsEmu - Austral Ornithology, 1977
- Morphological Similarity and Ecological Overlap among Passerine Birds on St. Kitts, British West IndiesOikos, 1977
- Habitat Selection and Interspecific Interactions among Mediterranean Sylviid WarblersOikos, 1976
- Resource Partitioning in Ecological CommunitiesScience, 1974
- THE EVOLUTION OF BILL SIZE DIFFERENCES AMONG SYMPATRIC CONGENERIC SPECIES OF BIRDSEvolution, 1965
- Homage to Santa Rosalia or Why Are There So Many Kinds of Animals?The American Naturalist, 1959