Hepatitis E virus infection in haemodialysis patients: A case‐control study in Saudi Arabia
- 4 January 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Medical Virology
- Vol. 66 (3) , 329-334
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.2149
Abstract
To determine the prevalence of antibody to hepatitis E virus (IgM anti‐HEV) among haemodialysis patients and evaluate whether there was an increased risk of infection and exposure to HEV in an area of endemic viral hepatitis, serum samples obtained from 83 Saudi patients on chronic haemodialysis (group 1), 400 sex‐ and age‐matched healthy subjects (group 2) and hospital patients (group 3) were tested for the IgM anti‐HEV and IgG anti‐HEV. The prevalence of anti‐HEV among the patients (group 1) and the healthy controls were 4.8% and 0.3%, respectively. The difference (4.5%) was statistically significant, with a calculated odds ratio (OR) of 20.2 (95% CI = 2.1–481.0; P = 0.0002). In contrast, there was no significant difference in the prevalence rates of IgG anti‐HEV (7.2% vs 10.8%) in both groups. In nonhaemodialysis patients with various diseases, 1.6% (1 of 64) of outpatients (group 3) and none (0 of 113) of the ward patients (group 4) was positive for IgM anti‐HEV. Thus, the prevalence (4 of 83) of IgM anti‐HEV in the haemodialysis patients was significantly higher than the rate (1 of 177) in the combined groups of nonhaemodialysis hospital patients. The calculated OR was 8.9 (95% CI = 0.92, 212.8; P = 0.037). IgM antibody to hepatitis A virus (IgM anti‐HAV) was not detected in any subjects, and the prevalence rates of IgG anti‐HAV were similar in the patients and controls (72.3% and 74.3% in groups 1 and 2, respectively, and 75.7% combined groups 3 and 4). The study indicated a significantly higher risk of acute HEV infection among patients on chronic haemodialysis. It is possible that these were nosocomial infections acquired by person‐to‐person transmission in the haemodialysis unit. However, it is more probable that the infections were community acquired, a conclusion supported albeit indirectly by the lack of a significant difference between the prevalence in haemodialysis patients (4.8%) and outpatients (1.6%). In areas of endemic HEV, appropriate strategies should be adopted to prevent the risk of HEV among haemodialysis patients. J. Med. Virol. 66:329‐334, 2002.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- ABNORMAL LIVER FUNCTION TESTS: ISeminars in Dialysis, 2007
- ELISA for IgG-class antibody to hepatitis E virus based on a highly conserved, conformational epitope expressed in Eschericia coliJournal of Virological Methods, 1999
- Evaluation of assays for antibody to hepatitis E virus by a serum panelHepatology, 1998
- Hepatitis EHepatology, 1993
- Hospital outbreak of hepatitis EThe Lancet, 1992
- Hepatitis E: Epidemiology, aetiology and molecular biologyReviews in Medical Virology, 1992
- Prevalence and significance of antibodies to hepatitis c virus among Saudi haemodialysis patientsJournal of Medical Virology, 1991
- Prevalence of antibody to hepatitis C virus among Saudi Arabian children: A community-based studyHepatology, 1991
- Isolation of a cDNA from the Virus Responsible for Enterically Transmitted Non-A, Non-B HepatitisScience, 1990
- Impact of Infection Control Strategies on the Incidence of Dialysis-Associated Hepatitis in the United StatesThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1986