WHAT WORKS: BLOCK WATCH MEETINGS OR CRIME PREVENTION SEMINARS?
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Crime and Justice
- Vol. 16 (1) , 1-27
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648x.1993.9721476
Abstract
Critical evaluations have found that crime prevention programs have no effect on the individual and community, or worse that they have negative effects. We argue that these findings are due to the unit of analysis used, the type of participation studied, and self-selection bias. This paper presents a study of individual-level participation in two types of crime prevention programs: block watch programs and crime prevention seminars and workshops. A correction is made for the self-selection bias inherent in such studies. The findings reveal that block watch participation has positive effects on the individual, whereas crime prevention seminar or workshop attendance does not.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Citizen crime prevention: Domains and participationJustice Quarterly, 1990
- FACTORS RELATED TO PARTICIPATION IN NEIGHBOURHOOD WATCH SCHEMESThe British Journal of Criminology, 1989
- Community-Based Crime Prevention: An Assessment of the Eisenhower Foundation's Neighborhood ProgramCrime & Delinquency, 1989
- Community crime prevention: A review and synthesis of the literatureJustice Quarterly, 1988
- The Theory and Research Behind Neighborhood Watch: Is it a Sound Fear and Crime Reduction Strategy?Crime & Delinquency, 1987
- The Statistical Analysis of Quasi-ExperimentsPublished by University of California Press ,1986
- Cognitive social learning and participation in community developmentAmerican Journal of Community Psychology, 1984
- A Framework of Participation in Community OrganizationsThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1981
- Participation and Democratic TheoryPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1970