The Economic Analysis of Industrial Accidents: a re-assessment
- 1 May 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Review of Applied Economics
- Vol. 12 (2) , 241-255
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02692179800000005
Abstract
Conventional economic approaches to the analysis of industrial accidents utilise the hedonic pricing approach. This approach usually excludes potentially important institutional, sociological and macroeconomic determinants of occupational safety. Initially we identify some of the theoretical and empirical problems with orthodox economic analysis in this area. An alternative model is then formulated which explicitly encompasses a broader range of determinants. Finally, the model is tested using UK industry accident data, the results being inconsistent with the compensating differentials' emphasis of orthodox analysis but supportive of the augmented model.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Estimating a Wage Curve for Britain 1973-90The Economic Journal, 1994
- Efficiency Effects of Premium-Setting Regimes under Workers' Compensation: Canada and the United StatesJournal of Labor Economics, 1993
- Testing Dynamic Models of Worker EffortJournal of Labor Economics, 1992
- Fear, Unemployment and Pay FlexibilityThe Economic Journal, 1991
- Occupational Safety and Health: A Problem of Double or Single Moral HazardJournal of Risk and Insurance, 1991
- Regression-based tests for overdispersion in the Poisson modelJournal of Econometrics, 1990
- Occupational Safety and Worker Preferences: Is There a Marginal Worker?The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1987
- Reputations for Safety: Market Performance and Policy RemediesJournal of Labor Economics, 1986
- Safety Regulation and Workplace InjuriesSouthern Economic Journal, 1986
- Was Adam Smith Right After All? Another Test of the Theory of Compensating Wage DifferentialsJournal of Labor Economics, 1983