Relative costs and cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of renal and ureteric stones
- 31 December 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Social Science & Medicine
- Vol. 32 (12) , 1401-1412
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(91)90201-m
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Role of Lithotripsy and Its Side EffectsJournal of Urology, 1989
- Clinical comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treating renal calculi.BMJ, 1988
- Cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsyUrology, 1988
- Comparison of Results and Morbidity of Percutaneous Nephrostolithotomy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave LithotripsyJournal of Urology, 1987
- Cost Analysis of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Relative to Other Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatment Alternatives for UrolithiasisMedical Care, 1986
- Stones, lithotripters, trials, and argumentsBMJ, 1986
- Technology assessment in Britain: lessons from the lithotripterBMJ, 1986
- Comparison of treatment of renal calculi by open surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.BMJ, 1986
- The randomised controlled trial in the evaluation of new technology: a case study.BMJ, 1986
- Long-term Follow-up 100 Cases of Renal CalculiBritish Journal of Urology, 1977